Sunday, July 17, 2016

Conversation Between Whitemen I Know....

Here is the conversation I told you about the other day between two Whitemen who I went to high school with and who were underneath the Rule of Myself and the Other Black Students of Our High School. Note that one is so easy to see through that it is pathetic. And for the record, Frank Smith got into a MASSIVE ARGUMENT with Clinton Fields, a Black student, who was happy when we learned about Nat Turner's Rebellion Our Senior Year where he and His Army slaughtered every White Person they came across INCLUDING THE WOMEN & CHILDREN!

Frank felt as though HE WENT TOO FAR! HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAH! So in his pathetic little White mind Black People REBELLING AGAINST SLAVERY AND THE MASSES OF WHITES WHO SUPPORTED AND CONDONED IT FOR AS LONG AS THEY COULD BULLSHIT ABOUT IT!

Nat Turner was WRONG for killing ALL THE WHITES WHEN HE REBELLED! This is the shit where I said Whites have a HISTORY FULL OF THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR! But it is OKAY WHEN THEY ARE THE ONES IN CONTROL THOUGH! It becomes INHUMANE AND UNFAIR WHEN IT IS THEY AND/OR THEM!

Who are now AT THE MERCY OF THEIR OWN SHITTY-STUPIDITY IN ENSLAVING AND FUCKING OVER OTHERS! You are NOT SUPPOSED TO CHILL WITH PEOPLE WHO SLAUGHTER YOU! And as it has been NOTED! When the Japanese DID NOT SURRENDER, THEY WERE NOT ONLY FIREBOMBED TO FUCKIN DEATH IN TOKYO! WHICH MANY PEOPLE FORGET ABOUT! Meaning WOMEN AND CHILDREN AND BABIES WERE LITERALLY BURNED AND BOMBED TO FUCKIN DEATH! We won't get into HEAT ASPHYXIATION!

But then they were ATOMIC BOMBED TWICE TOO!

Here is this charming convo between Whites I know and knew and note that ONCE I INTERJECTED WITH LAUGHTER!?
THE THREAD. 
ENDED!
Whereas we all know that someone coming in AND LAUGHING after you've just had a SERIOUS CONVO, who would IGNORE SOMEONE LAUGHING AT WHAT THEY JUST SPENT ALL THAT TIME TYPING! 
Where BOTH OF THEIR REACTIONS!?
Is EXACTLY LIKE OUR PEOPLE WHEN NAZI-COPS ROLL UP!
Evvvvvvvvvverybody GETS REALLLLLLLLLLLL QUIET!
And REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL NERVOUS!
Whether they are GUILTY.
OR INNOCENT!

It is RARE, for Blacks to ILLICIT GENUINE FEAR FROM WHITES WHERE THEY SHUT UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPERSE!
The way these two did!
THIS!?
Is what Black People ARE DESPERATE FOR!
The ability to KNOW that when they say "Ay, enough talking shit, SHUT UP!"
People then SHUT THE FUCK UP!
But not nearly enough of Us are willing to PUSH IT TO THE LIMIT & RISK LIFE LIMB AND EVERYTHING ELSE TO MAKE THINGS THIS WAY!
It takes SACRIFICE AND WILLINGNESS TO RISK YOURSELF TO GAIN THIS KIND OF POWER.
It DOESN'T GROW ON TREES!
Frank Smith The only issue with this is that the BLM movement villainizes another group of people. 

A better example would be "American Lives Matter" and to protest outside mosques.


Would that be acceptable? Characterizing one group in its entirity as victims of another entire group?

Thats how I see it. This meme to me is quite inaccurate.

Like · Reply · 18 hrs
Bill Roth
Bill Roth What group of people does BLM villainize?
Like · Reply · 1 · 18 hrs
Frank Smith
Frank Smith Police
Like · Reply · 16 hrs
Bill Roth
Bill Roth BLM does not villainize police, it's calling attention to police brutality. It's calling attention to the fact that black people are vastly, disproportionately more likely to be the victim of police brutality than any other race.
Like · Reply · 16 hrs
Frank Smith
Frank Smith Ok so what about black brutality? Blacks (males in particular) account for almost 60% of all violent crimes and there is no distinction in the stats (24% of police shootings are aginst blacks, 42% against white, again males) between a legal shooting and a crime. (or even by police or civillian)

This is all available on the FBI pages as well as numerous newpapers, washington post , NYTimes etc etc. Who also admit they make no distinction between "justified" shootings/ homicides and those that are purely felonies. Also when they happen to break them down they again ignore the fact how many crimes are commited by blacks in clack communities.

So agian a movement exaggerates its cause to further a bad sterotypical agenda. Hiding behind the facade as victims. I watch the news every night this week and have seen 4 black children shot and killed, 2 in drive bys and 2 while at a basketbal rec center game. All gang related and not one protest against the gangs or the know gang hangouts. I understand we should watch the police..but its your neighbors who are 4900 times more likely to harm/kill you. Just saying. Food for thought. 

Again I do not support BLM or thier obvious hidden agendas. Most as told to me by members of my comunity (black and hispanic) are, were or have family members who are gang members or somehow associated with criminal activities. SO , of course they do not trust police. Watch videos go to a rally. See the gang tats..if you know what your looking for you will see them.

If you wish to support them that is your right. Just be careful and keep your eyes open is all I ask. I have explaind my position, and shared why I side, as I do. This does not mean I give cops of any level a pass on anything. They should be watched. However by a single group with a manipulated agenda. Not the solution as I see it..

Like · Reply · 15 hrs
Bill Roth
Bill Roth I don't disagree with any of the stats you've supplied, nor do I think BLM doesn't have an agenda. My point was simply that BLM is not across-the-board anti-police, and to say that it is is naive. It's possible to both support BLM and to support police as a whole, as I do.
Like · Reply · 1 · 15 hrs
Frank Smith
Frank Smith I have no issue with you supporting both. As i have said I view BLM with suspiction, as it is a fertile ground for anti-police rhetoric (Dallas). I do not support the " alllivesmatter " idea either, to me thats just an argument to start a fight. Trolling at its best. I knew you way back when , I highly doubt you somehow grew all kinds of evil bones in your body. (was and still is one of the best people at CFS I came across) I see you as for how you support it. That said I just wanted to say why I am suspect of this high headline grabbing movement. For example I do not spit on Trump/Bernie/Clinto/addnamehere supporters..its thier leaders whom I view harshly. I simply apply the same, vigor(?), to this movement. 

I just dislike the comparrison to movements such as we against anykindofcancer.

Like · Reply · 14 hrs
Bill Roth
Bill Roth Appreciate the compliment and the feeling is mutual. You're probably right to view the leaders of the movement with skepticism and I will take a closer look at them. 

The point of the post though, is to tell the people who cry "all lives matter" to shut up. It's not directly comparing the movement itself to cancer, it's illustrating how stupid people who say "all live matter" sound.

Like · Reply · 14 hrs
Frank Smith
Frank Smith I get that, but I would rather you say..STFU ALLLIVESMATTER!.. more direct w/o Sugarcoating(?) BLM.

My 2 cents for what they may be worth.

Like · Reply · 13 hrs
Williams Shawn
Williams Shawn Hahahahahahah!

No comments:

Post a Comment