Good Evening from Philadelphia....
So this evening Youngest Brother & I did some digging & We focused on the Compromise of 1850 first:
The Compromise of 1850 was a package of five separate bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850 that defused a political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired in the Mexican–American War. It also set Texas's western and northern borders and included provisions addressing fugitive slaves and the slave trade. The compromise was brokered by Whig senator Henry Clay and Democratic senator Stephen Douglas with the support of President Millard Fillmore.
A debate over slavery in the territories had erupted during the Mexican–American War, as many Southerners sought to expand slavery to the newly-acquired lands and many Northerners opposed any such expansion. The debate was further complicated by Texas's claim to all former Mexican territory north and east of the Rio Grande, including areas it had never effectively controlled. These issues prevented the passage of organic acts to create organized territorial governments for the land acquired in the Mexican–American War. In early 1850, Clay proposed a package of eight bills that would settle most of the pressing issues before Congress. Clay's proposal was opposed by President Zachary Taylor, anti-slavery Whigs like William Seward, and pro-slavery Democrats like John C. Calhoun, and congressional debate over the territories continued. The debates over the bill were the most famous in Congressional history, and the divisions devolved into fistfights and drawn guns on the floor of Congress.
After Taylor died and was succeeded by Fillmore, Douglas took the lead in passing Clay's compromise through Congress as five separate bills. Under the compromise, Texas surrendered its claims to present-day New Mexico and other states in return for federal assumption of Texas's public debt. California was admitted as a free state, while the remaining portions of the Mexican Cession were organized into New Mexico Territory and Utah Territory. Under the concept of popular sovereignty, the people of each territory would decide whether or not slavery would be permitted. The compromise also included a more stringent Fugitive Slave Law and banned the slave trade in Washington, D.C. Finally, California was required to send 1 free senator and 1 pro-slavery senator to the U.S. Senate, despite nominally abolishing slavery. The issue of slavery in the territories would be re-opened by the Kansas–Nebraska Act, but the Compromise of 1850 played a major role in postponing the American Civil War.
Now?
If You remember?
The Latest Lie being told is that the United States ISN'T INHERENTLY ANTI-BLACK, well...?
This is pretty Anti-Black no matter how You try to lie. Note IT DOES NOT MENTION ANY OTHER RACES NOR DOES IT CONCERN ANY OTHER RACES.
SO THERE IS NO PEOPLE OF COLOR INVOLVED IN THIS.
ONLY.
BLACK-AMERICANS.
Of course this is 1850, and, you do understand that, right?
So that already means, that by this point in American-History.
Whites have had the ability to dictate, dominate, murder, rape, kill, & whatever else, the Black-American Population, since as early as Jamestown 1619.
In 1640 a Virginia Court started a process that still exists to this day.
A Blackman commits the same crime as a Whiteman & the Whiteman is given a slap on the wrist, while the Blackman is given a slap on his body with an entire building:
-------------------------------------------------------
There were no laws regarding slavery early in Virginia's history, but in 1640, a Virginia court sentenced John Punch, an African, to life in servitude after he attempted to flee his service.[23] The two whites with whom he fled were sentenced only to an additional year of their indenture, and three years' service to the colony.[24] This marked the first de facto legal sanctioning of slavery in the English colonies, and was one of the first legal distinctions made between Europeans and Africans.[23][25] -----------------------------------------------------
I'd like to thank all of the Black-Americans who have come-&-gone wasting Our Time with morality-talk & worthless-dreams of "equality".
When, as I always say-&-type "What's the History? We can start from There."
Mind You?
I am living by that more-&-more everyday & most importantly I am aware of the Fact that I cannot pretend like MY OWN OUTLOOK/S DON'T OR SHOULDN'T APPLY TO ME.
I'm going to post these next pieces to show HOW TOO MANY OF OUR PRESENT-DAY PROBLEMS ORIGINATED FROM SLAVERY:
----------------------------------------------
In 1641, Massachusetts became the first colony to authorize slavery through enacted law.[27] Massachusetts passed the Body of Liberties, which prohibited slavery in many instances but allowed people to be enslaved if they were captives of war, if they sold themselves into slavery or were purchased elsewhere, or if they were sentenced to slavery as punishment by the governing authority.[27] The Body of Liberties used the word "strangers" to refer to people bought and sold as slaves; they were generally not English subjects. Colonists came to equate this term with Native Americans and Africans.[28]
In 1654, John Casor, a black indentured servant in colonial Virginia, was the first man to be declared a slave in a civil case. He had claimed to an officer that his master, Anthony Johnson, had held him past his indenture term. Johnson himself was a free black, who had arrived in Virginia in 1621 from Angola. A neighbor, Robert Parker, told Johnson that if he did not release Casor, he would testify in court to this fact. Under local laws, Johnson was at risk for losing some of his headright lands for violating the terms of indenture. Under duress, Johnson freed Casor. Casor entered into a seven years' indenture with Parker. Feeling cheated, Johnson sued Parker to repossess Casor. A Northampton County, Virginia court ruled for Johnson, declaring that Parker illegally was detaining Casor from his rightful master who legally held him "for the duration of his life".[29]
During the colonial period, the status of enslaved people was affected by interpretations related to the status of foreigners in England. England had no system of naturalizing immigrants to its island or its colonies. Since persons of African origins were not English subjects by birth, they were among those peoples considered foreigners and generally outside English common law. The colonies struggled with how to classify people born to foreigners and subjects. In 1656 Virginia, Elizabeth Key Grinstead, a mixed-race woman, successfully gained her freedom and that of her son in a challenge to her status by making her case as the baptized Christian daughter of the free Englishman Thomas Key. Her attorney was an English subject, which may have helped her case. (He was also the father of her mixed-race son, and the couple married after Key was freed.)[30]
In 1662, shortly after the Elizabeth Key trial and similar challenges, the Virginia royal colony approved a law adopting the principle of partus sequitur ventrem (called partus, for short), stating that any children born in the colony would take the status of the mother. A child of an enslaved mother would be born into slavery, regardless if the father were a freeborn Englishman or Christian. This was a reversal of common law practice in England, which ruled that children of English subjects took the status of the father. The change institutionalized the skewed power relationships between those who enslaved people and enslaved women, freed white men from the legal responsibility to acknowledge or financially support their mixed-race children, and somewhat confined the open scandal of mixed-race children and miscegenation to within the slave quarters.
--------------------------------------------------
So now, as Usual.
The Sins-&-Crimes COMMITTED BY WHITES.
Are then COVERED UP BY OTHER WHITES.
And then DUMPED SOLELY ON THEIR BLACK-VICTIMS TO FIGURE OUT, FIGHT THROUGH, DEAL WITH & SOLVE.
So if We are supposed to ACKNOWLEDGE how much of scumbag THIS MAN WAS:
Then HOW DOES THIS SCUMBAG GET ANY KIND OF PASS:
And this is Thomas Jefferson in case you don't know or didn't know.
Mind You?
Thomas Jefferson GETS A PASS BECAUSE HE WON HIS WAR.
Adolf Hitler DOESN'T GET A PASS BECAUSE HE LOST HIS WAR.
And IT IS.
That FUCKIN SIMPLE.
And I needed to type that because I'm not here to GIVE CREDIBILITY TO WHITE-SOCIETY CIVILIZATION & HISTORY.
Everything IS ALWAYS ABOUT WHOEVER WINS WAS/IS RIGHT.
And FUCK WHOEVER LOST.
Thus the LATEST CON-JOB.
About "Why are Black-People trying to make White-People responsible for what happened in the Past!? We don't hold the Japanese responsible for bombing Pearl Harbor...!?"
Because YOU WON THAT WAR.
SCUMBAG.
And Japan has been WHITE-AMERICA'S LITTLE BROKEN BITCH EVER SINCE!
They still haven't gotten out of that FORCED RECESSION YOU TOSSED THEM INTO AFTER THEY GOT TOO UPPITY IN THE LATE-80'S EARLY-90'S!
When THEY EXPOSED THE FACT.
That YOU HAVE EVERYTHING "allegedly" FOR SALE OVER HERE.
They started BUYING UP SHIT & WHITES GOT UBER-PISSED & TANKED THE SHIT OUT OF THEIR ECONOMY BECAUSE YOU CONTROL THEIR FUCKIN CURRENCY...!
-_-
Heh!
Typing this gave Me a flashback to high school "Yo!? Look at how the Japanese are buying shit up quietly...?"
"Tch...!? Not for long. The Whites will eventually remind Them that because they lost WWII? They aren't actually in control of how their currency & economy actually works. So when they get tired of Them, and THEY WILL GET TIRED OF THEM. Then They'll tank Them. And then go to Denny's or some shit and laugh about how stupid They were to think They could actually buy up shit over here. Idiots...."
Mind You by that point We'd already seen THAT OUR OWN ADULT POPULATION WAS A BUNCH OF COWARDLY IDIOTS, so?
We had, AND STILL HAVE, Our Own Problems.
Which leads to the Compromise of 1850, which was once again all about the Power Dispute between the Whites of the North-&-South, much like how England, when America was ITS COLONIES.
Made sure NOT TO DO WHAT IT COULD HAVE DONE TO CREATE A PATH TO CITIZENSHIP FOR BLACK-AFRICANS BROUGHT IN AS SLAVES.
Everything, as I have constantly typed TO YOU, is ALWAYS ABOUT WHAT WHITES NEED/NEEDED, AT THAT TIME, FOR THEIR BENEFIT, AND THEIR BENEFIT, ALONE.
It has & still has, NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING THAT COULD POTENTIALLY HELP US, as Black-Americans.
This Compromise of 1850?
Had a KEY PIECE OF LEGISLATION IN IT.
SPECIFICALLY.
TIED.
TO US, AS BLACK-AMERICANS.
So note that when something is DETRIMENTAL, to Us, Whites can quickly agree to get that done & make it Law.
And here You go:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fugitive Slave Law
Perhaps the most important part of the Compromise received the least attention during debates. Enacted September 18, 1850, it is informally known as the Fugitive Slave Law, or the Fugitive Slave Act. It bolstered the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793. The new version of the Fugitive Slave Law required federal judicial officials in all states and federal territories, including in those states and territories in which slavery was prohibited, to assist with the return of escaped slaves to their masters actively in the states and territories permitting slavery. Any federal marshal or other official who did not arrest an alleged runaway slave was liable to a fine of $1000. Law enforcement everywhere in the US had a duty to arrest anyone suspected of being a fugitive slave on no more evidence than a claimant's sworn testimony of ownership. Suspected slaves could neither ask for a jury trial nor testify on their own behalf. Also, any person aiding a runaway slave by providing food or shelter was to be subject to six months' imprisonment and a $1000 fine. Officers capturing a fugitive slave were entitled to a fee for their work, and the cost was expected to be borne by the Federal Government.
The law was so rigorously pro-slavery as to prohibit the admission of the testimony of a person accused of being an escaped slave into evidence at the judicial hearing to determine the status of the accused escaped slave. Thus, if a freedman were claimed to be an escaped slave, they could not resist their return to slavery by truthfully telling their actual history. Furthermore, the federal commissioners overseeing the hearings were paid five dollars for ruling a person was free, but were paid 10 dollars for determining they were a slave, thus providing a financial incentive to always rule in favor of slavery regardless of the evidence.[56] The law further exacerbated the problem of free blacks being kidnapped and forced into slavery.
The Fugitive Slave Act was essential to meet Southern demands. In terms of public opinion in the North, the critical provision was that ordinary citizens were required to aid slave catchers. Many northerners deeply resented that requirement to help slavery personally. Resentment towards the Act continued to heighten tensions between the North and South, which were inflamed further by abolitionists such as Harriet Beecher Stowe. Her book, Uncle Tom's Cabin, stressed the horrors of recapturing escaped slaves and outraged Southerners.[58]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is yet another benchmark-LAW of where Tariq Nasheed's all-too-accurate quote of "I'm White and I say so", comes from.
Also note that, as I have constantly typed, Whites FORCE OTHER WHITES TO PARTICIPATE IN THEIR ATROCITIES.
Then LOOK DUMBFOUNDED WHEN THEY END UP LUMPED TOGETHER AS THEY ARE RIGHTFULLY SUPPOSED TO BE FOR GOING ALONG WITH THE BULLSHIT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
But remember?
What I am showing You comes from a place CLAIMING TO BE THE SPEARHEAD OF THE FREE-WORLD.
While STILL NOT HAVING PAID REPARATIONS TO BLACK-AMERICANS, but having PLENTY OF TIME TO HAVE PAID REPARATIONS TO THE LITERAL CONFEDERATE-TRAITORS OF THE SOUTH.
So now?
Go and look up THE DATE OF ORIGIN FOR YOUR PRESENT-DAY POLICE DEPARTMENTS, and whyyyyyyyyyy, shocker of shockers!?
Their FORMAL INCEPTIONS are CENTERED AROUND THE COMPROMISE OF 1850.
-_-
REMEMBER.
The Compromise of 1850 was the year everything FINALLY CAME TOGETHER, however?
You will find that MOST "police departments" HAVE THEIR POINT OF ORIGINS IN-&-AROUND 1850.
SOUTHERN POLICE DEPARTMENTS WERE STILL SLAVE-PATROLS & THUS YOU'LL FIND THEIR POINTS OF ORIGINS AFTER THE CONFEDERATE-SOUTHERN WHITE TRAITORS LOST THE CIVIL WAR.
This is why WHITES DON'T WANT TO PAY OUT REPARATIONS.
Because BLACK-AMERICAN HISTORY ACTUALLY HAS NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL THE HORRIFIC TRUTH ABOUT HOW THIS EMPIRE CAME TO BE WHAT IT IS TODAY.
And why it has all of the Racial-Problems IT IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE NOW.
I am NOT typing this as a form of pathetic, SOCIAL JUSTICE.
I have typed this BECAUSE THIS IS ABOUT RACIAL JUSTICE FOR BLACK-AMERICANS.
And TO REMIND YOU.
That Our Actions & Reactions, DON'T & DIDN'T COME, FROM OUT OF THIN FUCKIN AIR!
Oh?
One Last Thing TIED TO the Compromise of 1850 TO FURTHER hammer home WHY WHITES DO NOT HAVE ANY CREDIBILITY:
------------------------------------------------------------------
From its very beginning, Oregon was an inhospitable place for black people. In 1844, the provisional government of the territory passed a law banning slavery, and at the same time required any African American in Oregon to leave the territory. Any black person remaining would be flogged publicly every six months until he left. Five years later, another law was passed that forbade free African Americans from entering into Oregon, according to the Communities of Color report.
In 1857, Oregon adopted a state constitution that banned black people from coming to the state, residing in the state, or holding property in the state. During this time, any white male settler could receive 650 acres of land and another 650 if he was married. This, of course, was land taken from native people who had been living here for centuries.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
So Oregon?
Which I've typed to You about before.
AS WELL AS THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.
But Oregon, was founded as a state BANNING SLAVERY.
Again, THIS IS TIED TO THE EVENTUAL COMPLETION-CREATION OF THE COMPROMISE OF 1850.
So the "Federal Government of Whites" BANNED SLAVERY.
But then "The STATE OF OREGON GOVERNMENT OF WHITES" said "We'll JUST WHIP BLACKS & TORMENT-&-TORTURE THEM TILL THEY LEAVE."
Ahem?
I believe I've also typed that Whites LOVE to PRETEND LIKE they're ADDRESSING AN ISSUE, yet MYSTERIOUSLY!?
HA-HA, no.
They're not.
Because THEY NEVER REALLY WANTED TO ACTUALLY SOLVE THAT SITUATION/CIRCUMSTANCE IN THE FIRST PLACE, and uhhhhhhhhh, why, yeah, why would WHITES?
Who ARE NO LONGER "of Europe"?
CONTINUE TO FOLLOW WHITE-EUROPEAN STUPIDITY?
Because after 1000's of years of LETTING the small group of "Their Leaders-&-Politicians" and UPPER CASTE-CLASS, TRASH!
RULE-&-RUIN THEM, now...?
It's become A PART OF HOW THEY DO THINGS AS A COLLECTIVE.
Wait what do I mean, I MEAN!?
The Whites of OREGON?
They could've just said "FUCK WHAT YOU MUTHAFUCKAS SAY IN DC!? WE'RE OREGON & WE DON'T WANT ANY NIGGERS HERE & THAT'S THAT!? SECOND-AMENDMENT BITCH!!!!!!"
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH, you do see what I DID THERE, right?
RIGHT!?
For all You SECOND-AMENDMENT IDIOTS!
Why EXACTLY?
Didn't OREGON!?
SCREAM AT THE TOP ITS COLLECTIVE LUNGS "WE'Z GOT RIGHT!!!!!! AND DA SECOND AMENDMENT BE PROTECTIN US FROM GOV-MENT TIER-OH-KNEE!!!! SO WE'Z GONE TAKE UP ARMS & RESIST TO DA DEATH!!!!!!"
-_-
I know that was over the top, I couldn't help it.
Because I love THE SELECTIVE STUPIDITY that Whites TRY TO USE.
Mind You MY OWN RACE IS NOW INFECTED WITH THIS BULLSHIT, so?
MY POINT HOWEVER IS STILL MADE!
And I ALREADY TOLD YOU.
The 2nd-Amendment DOESN'T HAVE SHIT TO DO WITH THE LIES BEING TOLD TODAY.
The 2nd-Amendment IS STRICTLY TIED TO WHITES BEING ABLE TO FORM UP INTO MILITIAS TO SUPPRESS BLACK-AMERICAN SLAVE REVOLTS WITHOUT HAVING TO FEAR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CLAIMING THEY ARE REVOLTING AGAINST THEM...!
Always ALWAYS ALWAYS REMEMBER!!!!!
That LAWS ARE CREATED BASED ON THE TIMES WHEN THEY WERE CREATED.
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!
Enough.
Enough....