I have just finished typing a short story for Pagan Wars! I am tired. >_< Ran around all day yesterday and the day before. Trying to see if I can get a grant either as a writer or as a small-ebusiness owner. Of course, people trying to be stingy! Give me the run around. PLAY STUPID! Then trying to finish this short story!
But it is done.
I have another short-story that I will put up and I'm gonna post THIS SHORT STORY LATER ON, after I get some sleep!
But I keep forgetting that it has only been TWO FUCKIN WEEKS SINCE I STARTED ALL OF THIS!
That's it, OF COURSE! I HAVE TOO MUCH TO POST! From Chris Paul and Nik Vucevic in SOUTH AFRICA! To the bullshit still going on over Ms. Bland's murder! To the fact that someone finally decided to shut down a corrupt Baltimore City Prison! To Pennsylvania Congressman Chaka Fattah getting busted, YET NO ONE CAN TELL ME WHAT WHITE-ASS TOM CORBETT DID WITH THAT CASH ASSISTANCE MONEY AFTER CLAIMING HE WAS GONNA DIVERT IT TO SMALL-BUSINESSES!? THE ROCK REACTS TO HULK HOGAN'S NIGGER-RANT! SOUTH SUDANESE MODEL NYKHOR PAUL POINTING OUT THE BIGOTRY IN FASHION INDUSTRY! A WHITEWOMAN JUDGE WHO INTENTIONALLY TURNS HER BACK ON A WOMAN IN HER COURT SO HER PERVY BAILIFF CAN HAVE HIS WAY WITH HER RIGHT IN THE JUDGES COURTROOM! TOM BRADY'S PHONY-ASS ONCE AGAIN SHOWING THAT THE PATRIOTS ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUD AMERICAN FOOTBALL TEAM IN HISTORY! AND A WHOLE BUNCH OF OTHER SHIT TOO!
For now though!? I'm going to bed! And I'll be back later on today to post all this stuff up here and all that good stuff!
LATER!
I am in the midst of typing and working out more concepts and comparing them to real world events and getting things in order. I realized that since the characters IN THIS SHORT ARE BIOENGINEERED. I immediately said to myself;
How are they TREATED since they are ARTIFICIAL LIFEFORMS who were created to fight against OTHER ARTIFICIAL LIFEFORMS LIKE THEMSELVES?
What Rights do they have?
What do they think of Humans?
What do they think of Our Behavior and How are THEY IMPACTED BY IT AND US?
Ananda Anchorage is a fictional character where HER LAST NAME is actually the place where she was CREATED AT. So Ananda was CREATED in Anchorage, Alaska. She is a part of the Imperial American Counterstrike Forces and she is stationed at Alpha Foundry Base, along the Tennessee River in Tennessee. She's a deployment-platoon sergeant who may or MAY NOT end up being 2nd to the main character. So I'm fleshing things out and the questions I mentioned above got me thinking and I said to myself this is what I'm gonna put down as the notes for Ananda's military-bio;
Ananda has 3/5th-Rights
under Imperial American Law.
This is what caused me to turn to the 13th Amendment of Nazi-America, to see WHAT EXACTLY DOES IT MEAN TO BE 3/5TH'S OF A PERSON, CITIZEN, ETC! I already knew that VOTING!? YOU DON'T GET THAT AT 3/5TH'S OF A CITIZEN, VOTING IS OUT! But then digging into the details of everything else caused me to REVIEW THE 13TH AMENDMENT and THIS IS WHAT I FOUND AND LEMME MAKE IT CLEAR! Slavery IS COMPLETELY LEGAL RIGHT NOW IN NAZI-AMERICA IF YOU BECOME A CONVICTED FELON! And many people STILL DON'T KNOW OR GET THAT. They don't know that the 13th Amendment ONLY APPEARS TO ABOLISH SLAVERY, BUT!? It tells you TO YOUR FACE that you CAN BE MADE A SLAVE IF YOU BECOME A CONVICTED FELON. Prison Industrial Complex Anyone!? AND!? Here is the reason why Whites LOVE THROWING BLACK PEOPLE BEHIND BARS FOR ANYTHING, BECAUSE THEN!? YOU INSTANTLY GET RETURNED BACK TO SLAVE STATUS! Here is one forum that I came across and looked over the 13th Amendment; The Thirteenth Amendment: The Abolition of Slavery The Issue: What is the history behind the 13th Amendment? Is it "self-enacting"? What sorts of private activities might Congress regulate under its enforcement provision?
Introduction
Delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 hotly debated the issue of slavery. George Mason of Virginia argued eloquently against slavery, warning his fellow delegates: "Every master of slaves is born a petty tyrant. They bring the judgment of heaven on a country. As nations cannot be rewarded or punished in the next world, they must be in this. By an inevitable chain of causes and effects, providence punishes national sins by national calamities."Southern delegates, on the other hand, argued strenuously that the new government should not be allowed to interfere with the institution of slavery. Delegate John Rutledge of South Carolina, for example, told delegates that "religion and humanity have nothing to do with the questions" of whether the Constitution should protect slavery--it was simply a question of property rights.
The Constitution that the delegates proposed included several provisions that explicity recognized and protected slavery. Without these provisions, southern delegates would not support the new Constitution--and without the southern states on board, the Constitution had no chance of being ratified. Provisions allowed southern states to count slaves as 3/5 persons for purposes of apportionment in Congress (even though the slaves could not, of course, vote), expressly denied to Congress the power to prohibit importation of new slaves until 1808, and prevented free states from enacting laws protecting fugitive slaves.
Slavery, as all students of history know, continued to be a divisive issue up through the Civil War. Southern states worried that the balance in Congress might tip against slavery, and so were anxious to extend slavery to new territories and states. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 (enacted at a time when slave states and non-slave states had equal representation in the Senate) permitted slavery in Missouri, but prohibited slavery in portions of the Louisiana purchase north of 36°30'.
The Supreme Court, in its infamous decision in Dred Scott v Sandford (1857), ruled that Congress lacked the power to prohibit slavery in its territories. In so doing, Scott v Sandford invited slave owners to pour into the territories and pass pro-slavery constitutions. The decision made the Civil War inevitable. Chief Justice Roger Taney, writing for the majority in Scott, also concluded that people of African ancestry (whether free or a slave, including Scott) could never become "citizens" within the meaning of the Constitution, and hence lacked the ability to bring suit in federal court.
Dred Scott
Before the Civil War ended, Congress passed, and sent to the states for ratification, the Thirteenth Amendment which abolished "slavery" and "involuntary servitude" and authorized Congress to enact "appropriate legislation" implementing the abolition. The Amendment was understood to also make blacks citizens of the United States (overruling Dred Scott on that point). The House vote to propose the Thirteenth Amendment followed the Senate vote, and barely made the 2/3 majority requirement. When the vote was announced the galleries cheered, congressmen embraced and wept, and Capitol cannons boomed a 100-gun salute. Congressmena George Julian of Indiana wrote in his diary, "I have felt, ever since the vote, as if I were in a new country." Ratification by the states quickly followed, and Secretary of State Seward proclaimed the Amendment adopted on December 18, 1865.
Less than a year after ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment, Congress used its newly conferred power to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1866, giving black citizens "the same right in every state...to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, ...to inherit, purchase, sell, and convey real and personal property; and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property as is enjoyed by white citizens." Supporters if the 1866 law argued that its guarantees constituted "appropriate" means of "enforcing" the right of blacks not to be held in bondage.
The Thirteenth Amendment, unlike most provisions in the Constitution, is self-executing, in that it directly reaches-even without action by Congress- conduct by private individuals (slave holders). Because of this fact, Congress's power under the Thirteenth Amendment allows it to punish forms of private conduct when it might not be able to do so under an amendment such as the Fourteenth, which restricts the conduct of states (prohibitingstates from denying equal protection of the laws or due process). The Thirteenth Amendment has not produced nearly the volume of Supreme Court decisions as has the Fourteenth Amendment, or even the Fifteenth Amendment (guaranteeing the vote to black citizens). In 1916, in Butler v Perry, the Court rejected a challenge brought by a Florida man to a state law that required all able-bodied men between 21 and 45, when called to do so, to work for up to 60 hours on maintaining public roads. The plaintiff, convicted of failing to put in his time on the roads and sentenced to jail, argued that the law mandated "involuntary servitude" in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. Justice McReynolds, writing for the Court, concluded "the term 'involuntary servitude' was intended to cover those forms of compulsory labor akin to African slavery which, in practical operation, would tend to produce like undesirable results." Jones vs Alfred H. Mayer Co. (1968) arose when the developer of a surburban St. Louis subdivision refused to sell Joseph Jones a home because he was black. Jones sued the developer, alleging a violation of the 1866 Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 1982) which granted "all citizens of the United States...the same right as is enjoyed by white citizens...to purchase...real property." The Court rejected the developer's argument that Congress lacked the power under Section 2 of the 13th Amendment to ban private discrimination in housing. According to the Court in Jones, so long as Congress could rationally conclude that private discrimination in the housing market was "a badge of slavery," the statute should be upheld.
Finally, in Memphis v Greene (1981) the Court reversed a 6th Circuit ruling that the closing of a road separating an all-white neighborhood from a predominately black neighborhood constituted a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment. The Court found that the modest inconvenience and speculative loss of property value to black residents was insufficient either to be considered "a badge of slavery" protected against by the Thirteenth Amendment, or a violation of the 1866 Civil Rights Act enacted under the power granted to Congress by Section 2 of the amendment. Four dissenting justices would have found the closing to violate the 1866 Act.
42 U.S.C. 1982: (1866 Civil Rights Act, which the Court found to be a constitutional exercise of Congress's power under Section 2 of the 13th Amendment--even as it reaches private discrimination):
"All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property."
The Constitution and Slavery: Provisions in the Original Constitution
Article I, Section. 2 [Slaves count as 3/5 persons]
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons [i.e., slaves]. Article I, Section. 9, clause 1. [No power to ban slavery until 1808]The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall
think proper to
admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight,
but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person. Article IV, Section. 2. [Free states cannot protect slaves]
No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another,
shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour,
but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due. Article V [No Constitutional Amendment to Ban Slavery Until 1808]
...No Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article.
The Thirteenth AmendmentPassed by Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865.
Section 1.Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof
the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any
place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Was the Civil War about slavery?
The short answer is "yes." One might consider, for example, Mississippi's 21-paragraph declaration of reasons in 1861 for leaving the Union. Only two paragraphs, one introductory and the other conclusory, did not mention slavery. The state's principal complaints concerned the refusal of free states to return fugitive slaves and opposition of the extension of slavery into the territories. The election of Abraham Lincoln, on an anti-slavery platform, obviously had a lot to do with the decisions of southern states to secede as well. The best evidence that "states' rights" was a secondary interest of the southern states is the Confederate Constitution which forced states to accept central authority on the issue of slavery and required all new territories in the Confederation to become slave states, regardless of the popular will of the people of the new state.
Lincoln's Three Proposed Constitutional Amendments of 1862
1. Federal compensation provided for states agreeing to abolish slavery by January 1, 1900. 2. Frees slaves who "enjoyed actual freedom by the chances of war" before "the end of the rebellion." 3. Congress authorized to provide for colonization outside of the United States of free blacks by their own consent.
Chief Justice Roger Taney, author of the Court's opnion in Scott v Sandford Questions
1. What does it tell us about constitutional interpretation when we observe that the seven justices in the majority in Scott v Sandford were from slave-holding southern states, and that the two diessenters were from northern states? 2. It is worth noting that Scott v Sandford was the only case in eight decades of pre-Civil War constitutional history in which the Supreme Court limited congressional power in any substantial way. What does it say about the Court's jurisprudence that the Court upheld the Fugitive Slave Act, finding it well within the powers of Congress? 3. Slavery laws have been applied to some private criminal enterprises, such as prostitution rings. When might states violate the Thirteenth Amendment? Butler suggests that mandatory work requirements are generally not violations, but what if state law required all able-bodied adults to pick cotton for 100 hours a year? If the same law applied only to African-Americans, it would undoubtedly violate the Equal Protection Clause--would it also violate the Thirteenth Amendment? 4. Would a real estate agency that steered potential black buyers away from white neighborhoods violate the Thirteenth Amendment? The 1866 Civil Rights Act? 5. The 13th Amendment is unique in that by its own words it applies to private individuals as well as government. How far does Section 2 of the 13th Amendment go in allowing Congress to reach forms of private discrimination? If discrimination in housing can be "a badge of slavery," might also discrimination in the membership policies of a private club? 6. Supreme Court decisions subsequent to Jones pointedly avoid assuming that Congress has unlimited discretion to call any private conduct it chooses "a badge of slavery," and then regulate it. How should a court decide whether a particular form of private discrimination in reachable by Section 2 of the 13th Amendment? 7. Should whites be protected by the Thirteenth Amendment against the same sorts of private discrimination as are African-Americans?
It's busy around here today!
A White New York City Judge has decided to keep everything under wraps regarding the Eric Garner grand jury decision NOT to prosecute the Murderers of Eric Garner. He won't even release the smallest of information;
Eric Garner grand jury minutes to stay private, New York court rules
1 hour ago
.
View photo
A protester wears a sign during a demonstration against the New York City grand jury decision to not …
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York state court on Wednesday declined to release details of a grand jury investigation that led to a police officer being cleared of wrongdoing in the death of Eric Garner after his chokehold arrest in Staten Island in July last year.
Garner was black and Pantaleo is white, and the case caused widespread protests last year.Lawyers for civil rights groups and New York's public advocate office in June called for the release of the grand jury minutes including transcripts of testimony, exhibits and details of certain grand jurors to better understand the decision not to charge officer Daniel Pantaleo for Garner's death.
The lawyers did not establish a compelling reason for disclosure of the minutes, the appellate division of New York State's Supreme Court said on Wednesday.
"The public interest in preserving grand jury secrecy outweighed the public interest in disclosure," the ruling said.
Concerns about the safety of grand jurors and the potential to compromise an ongoing federal investigation into the incident were also cited as reasons not to release the details.
Eric Garner, a 43-year-old father of six, was illegally selling cigarettes in New York's Staten Island on July 17 last year when police officers including Pantaleo tackled him to the ground and put him in a chokehold. The city's medical examiner ruled the death a homicide.
The arrest was caught on video, including Garner's repeated pleas for the officers to release him, telling them he could not breath.
New York City earlier this month agreed to pay Garner's family $5.9 million to resolve the claim over his death.
The grand jury decision not to charge Pantaleo was met with protests and rallies in December. It came just one week after a grand jury in Missouri decided not to indict a white police officer in another racially charged killing of a black man.
The decision in that case sparked a spasm of violence in Ferguson, Missouri, with businesses burned and looted.
(Reporting by Edward McAllister; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
You know?
There comes a point when you have to just stop kidding yourself. We have to stop kidding ourselves in regards to what is going on out here. It has been made crystal clear that the pattern is, as a Nazi-Cop or just a White Person in general or one of their Coon-Ass Nigger-Traitor Slaves. Just, provoke. If you can't provoke a Black Person, then just talk shit about them till they snap. Use your authority to hem them up. Then simply berate and bullshit until Your Black Target SNAPS! Then you simply unload your weapon while claiming YOU, the Provocateur, were the victim.
After you've killed whomever this Black Person was, then just scream really loudly that YOUR LIFE WAS IN DANGER. If you have a badge, scream into the badge "OH MY GOD HE'S DRAGGING ME DOWN THE STREET! I ALMOST GOT RUN OVER MAN!" then calmly turn off your dashcam and bodycam and then use the Fraternal Order of Nazi-Police to hide behind. All YOU HAVE TO DO, is claim that whomever the Black Person is that you've just killed? HAS THE STRENGTH OF A HUNDRED BLACK PEOPLE! And that's why you had to shot them in the face.
Now? Of course, good sense will tell you that IF WE DID HAVE THE STRENGTH OF A HUNDRED BLACK PEOPLE, in each one of us, well? You'd be dead. Let's just call a spade a spade. No White Person or Nazi-Cop would even WANT TO CHANCE IT, EVEN WITH A GUN! If EVERY BLACK PERSON, has the strength of A HUNDRED BLACK PEOPLE inside of them. You'd LITERALLY BE RIPPED TO NASTY, CHUNKY, BLOODY BODY-PIECES! If this lie was true, where AGAIN!? The WHITE STEREOTYPE is ALIVE AND BREATHING! Living a full, wonderful LIFE! Of;
Black People are bruteforce savages. And yes, I took brute force and made it one word, bruteforce. Because I can and I did.
The funny thing is that the stereotypes ABOUT US AS BLACK PEOPLE, actually APPLY MORE TO WHITE PEOPLE THAN US. Could I give you a pound-for-pound BREAKDOWN?! Yes I could. Will I?
No.
I will not.
All of this bullshit will stop, when we as Black People make it stop and guess what? Walking around chanting BLACK LIVES MATTER? HA! That's not gonna do shit. That's not gonna do shit. And thanks, but I already KNOW my life matters. Making it mean something comes from a CONCERTED EFFORT BY US AS BLACK PEOPLE TO GET TOGETHER WITH OTHER BLACK PEOPLE AND BEGIN TO BUILD TANGIBLE CONCRETE PRODUCTION ORIENTED RESULTS THAT IMPACT BEYOND SOCIAL BULLSHIT. Here is the article;
WATCH: Body cam video released in Sam DuBose shooting
WARNING: The video above may be too graphic for some viewers. Watch with discretion.
CINCINNATI - UC police officer Ray Tensing's body camera video clearly shows that he committed "murder" when he shot and killed an unarmed black motorist at a traffic stop, prosecutor Joe Deters said Wednesday.
The shocking video shows Tensing, standing outside the driver's door, with 43-year-old Sam DuBose at the wheel. The two men talk calmly and politely for about 90 seconds. Tensing repeatedy asks DuBose to produce a driver's license. DuBose says he has a license but he doesn't have it with him, and he apologizes.
"I just don't. I'm sorry. I'm just going to go in my house," DuBose says, with his car facing south on Rice Street in Mount Auburn.
"OK. Where do you stay at? Down here?" Tensing asks.
DuBose: "Right around the corner."
Tensing: "OK, as far as I can figure out if you have a license or not, go ahead and take your seat belt off."
Tensing pulls the door latch and opens the door a few inches.
DuBose pulls it closed with his left hand and uses his right hand to reach for the car key in the ignition.
"I ain't even do nothing," DuBose says.
"Go ahead and take your seat belt off," Tensing says again.
DuBose turns the key and revs the engine, but the car doesn't move.
Tensing pulls his gun, shouts, "Stop! Stop!" and shoots DuBose in the head - at point-blank range - through the open window.
The car jumps forward and rolls down the street about 100 yards until it runs into the curb and stops.
Tensing runs after the car and yells, "Shots fired! Shots fired!" into his radio.
Showing the video publicly for the first time, Deters called it an "asinine, senseless shooting" and announced that a grand jury had indicted Tensing for murder. Tensing turned himself in and UC fired him after the indictment.
Deters said the video refutes Tensing's claim that DuBose pulled away from the stop and dragged him with his car.
DuBose did "nothing violent" toward Tensing, Deters said, adding that the video shows Tensing falling because he had just shot DuBose.
"I think he (Tensing) lost his temper because Mr. DuBose would not get out of his car. He wasn't dragged. When you see it, you will not believe how quickly he pulled his gun and shot him in the head," Deters said at a 1 p.m. news conference.
"He was simply, slowly rolling away. That's it," Deters said.
"It was senseless. It didn't have to happen," Deters said, adding that Tensing should have never stopped DuBose for not having a front license plate.
"It was a chicken-crap stop," Deters said.
According to the police incident report, Tensing said DuBose was dragging him with his car and Tensing feared he would be run over when he fired a single shot that killed DuBose. On the body cam video, you can hear Tensing say at least six times that he thought DuBose was going to run over him, four times that DuBose was dragging him and twice that Tensing got his hand or arm caught in DuBose's car:
Tensing: “I thought he was going to run me over.”
Other officer: “You OK?”
Tensing: "I’m good.”
Later, Tensing speaks to the dispatcher:
“Thirty-three, I’m not injured. I almost got ran over by the car. He took off on me. I discharged one round. Struck the male in the head.”
More Tensing on the video:
“I just got tangled in the car. I thought I was going to get run over.”
"He just took off on me, man. I thought he was going to run me over.”
“I think I’m OK. He was just dragging me. I thought I was going to get ran over. I was trying to stop him.”
“Ugh, I thought he was going to run me over. He was dragging me…Yeah, he took off on me. My hand was caught inside.”
“God, he was dragging me man … I’m good. I just got my hand and my arm caught inside.”
“I think I’m good [no injuries]. I missed his tires, luckily. I was just getting [dragged] by him.”
Deters said he feels sorry for DuBose's family and he showed them the video first. WCPO's Ally Kraemer reported that DuBose's family arrived at the prosecutor's office at noon and and left shortly before the news conference.
Dreading what it might show, the community had braced itself for the video's release, especially after statements by two men who had seen it.
"It's not good, " Police Chief Jeffrey Blackwell declared Monday. On Tuesday, Tensing's attorney, Stew Mathews, said he expected an indictment based on his viewing
DuBose's family and supporters disputed the police report and demanded to see Tensing's video. WCPO and other media outlets sued Deters to release the video, but Deters had refused, saying the video could taint the ongoing investigation.
All along, Deters said he would release the video after the grand jury saw it and decided whether or not
The bodycam video of the murder of Mr. Sam DuBose has finally been released and it is pretty much the same as what happened to Ms. Sandra Bland. White Nazi-Cop gives unnecessary hard time to Black Motorist. Black Motorist knows that the shit that the White Nazi-Cop is doing is bullshit. Complies within reason, White Nazi-Cop needs to SHOW Black Motorist that THEY ARE NOT WHITE AND CANNOT AND ARE NOT AFFORDED THE SAME COURTESY, RESPECT OR PROTECTION OF NAZI-AMERICAN LAWS.
Black Motorist becomes frustrated with being illegally ass-fucked by White Nazi-Cop. White Nazi-Cop refuses to stop and SHIT HITS THE FAN WHERE WHITE NAZI-COP SIMPLY USES RIDICULOUS AMOUNT OF LETHAL OR PERMANENT FORCE TO KILL BLACK MOTORIST!
I think what is most interesting here is that Mr. DuBose tells White Nazi-Cop Ray Tensing that he doesn't have his license on him and that he can pull his records and ID using his Nazi-Cop Car Computer, WHICH IS TRUE! However? Since White Nazi-Cop Ray Tensing has eaten too many donuts and coffee, he's TOO FUCKIN LAZY TO GO BACK TO HIS OWN NAZI-COP CAR AND SIMPLY INPUT DUBOSE'S INFORMATION AND LOOK HIM UP THE WAY HE COULD. Well? WE CAN'T HAVE THAT NOW CAN WE!? Because then!? HOW WOULD RAY GET HIS JOLLIES AND FEEL LIKE A BIG TOUGH LITTLE DICKED WHITEMAN IF HE DID THAT!?
And yes? I have mentioned dick size because since day-1 with lynchings here in Nazi-America, Whites have been OBSESSED WITH BLACKMEN'S DICKS! Which? -_- Yo, that shit just creeps me the fuck out, seriously. Fuck are you worried about my fuckin package for? HOWEVER!? I am aware of why and that just makes it CREEPIERRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. It also ties into the obsession with Whites constantly trying to paint us as Blackmen, as these savage, hulking, sexual predators. And Blackwomen as oversexualized Jungle-bunnies. And when me? I? The guy with too much porn has to type that, then?
The fact that Corey Holcomb, Zo Williams, Freeze Luv and Darlene talked about it last night on the 5150 Show episode, where? Zo said it best "It is CLEAR that Whites IN POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY, WANT A RACE WAR WITH US! They are INTENTIONALLY KILLING BLACK CHILDREN AND BLACKWOMEN! TO SEE IF WE'RE GONNA FINALLY SNAP AS BLACKMEN AND START SHOOTING AND KILLING THEM! THEY WANT A RACE WAR WITH US! THEY'RE DOING THIS SHIT ON PURPOSE TO PROVOKE US!"
^_^
And I was like "Bout time somebody actually admitted the obvious." these things aren't RANDOMLY HAPPENING. They're happening, ON PURPOSE. Here is the video FIRST and BEAR IN MIND THAT NAZI-COP RAY TENSING, LIKE ALL NAZI-COPS, LIED ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED AND!? OTHER NAZI-COPS VERIFIED AND SUPPORTED HIS LIE, TOO! Which means FIRINGS ALL AROUND UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES. But here is the video, first. And wait?! Is this guy just some college campus Nazi-Cop? THIS SHIT JUST GETS MORE AND MORE WHITE PRIVILEGED-BIGOTED UP!?;
Here is an article concerning New Nigerian President Buhari and Our Resident Bullshitter Barack Obama. In it, Obama SUPPOSEDLY is helping out Buhari by giving him some names of Corrupt Oil Thieves, however? To MY LIMITED KNOWLEDGE. I saw no mention of any Whites working for BP Oil, Exxon Mobil and everyone else who was plundering the Nigerian Oil Industry dry. Holding Whites accountable for anything against Black People seems to be a sick running joke where the punchline is literal and the hot lead is real. Here is the article;
Obama Gives Nigerian President Buhari Names Of Oil Thieves, Goodluck Jonathan Administration Accused Of Corruption
By Morgan Winsor@MorganWinsorIBT on July 29 2015 8:08 AM EDT
U.S. President Barack Obama meets with Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on July 20, 2015. SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
The U.S. government allegedly gave Nigeria’s President Muhammadu Buhari the names of Nigerian oil thieves who have been stealing and illegally stockpiling the West African nation’s oil. U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration provided Buhari with the names last week when the Nigerian leader was visiting the White House, according to a Nigerian newspaper that cited presidential sources.
A member of the Nigerian president’s entourage told the Punch that Buhari was shocked by the names, and it could prompt him to probe the administration of former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan, who was widely accused of corruption. “I can tell you that the president already has the list of names of the people engaging in the stealing of Nigeria’s oil. The list, when released by the president, will shock Nigerians,” the source, who reportedly spoke on condition of anonymity, told the newspaper on Tuesday.
A second unnamed source within Buhari’s administration confirmed with the Punch that Buhari was given the names of top Nigerian government officials who were abusing their power to loot the country’s oil, as well as the names of illegal oil hoarders. “The president will probe all of them and make sure they return whatever fortune they made from their thievery,” the source, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, told the Punch on Tuesday.
U.S. President Barack Obama (right) meets with Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari (left) in the Oval Office of the White House on July 20, 2015 in Washington, DC. The two leaders discussed various topics including Nigeria's economy, corruption and the fight against the Boko Haram terrorist group. Alex Wong/Getty Images
The Nigerian leader, who took office on May 29, has vowed to clean up corruption from previous administrations and to hold perpetrators fully accountable. Last week, Buhari said about 250,000 barrels of crude oil are stolen each day in Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil producer, and that some former ministers sold as much as 1 million barrels per day. He had asked Obama to help locate and return $150 billion believed to have been stolen by corrupt government officials, according to Bloomberg. The two leaders met at the White House in Washington last week for talks on Nigeria's economy, corruption and Islamist militant group Boko Haram, among other topics.
“The amount involved is mind-boggling,” Buhari said of the oil scandal on July 21, according to a statement from his office. “A lot of damage has been done to the integrity of Nigeria with individuals and institutions already compromised.”
Jonathan conceded power to Buhari immediately after losing the March presidential election, marking the first time an incumbent didn't declare victory in Nigeria. But some members of Jonathan’s administration were slow to provide handover notes to Buhari’s incoming government, making the transfer of power less smooth.
Jonathan’s political faction, the once-ruling Peoples Democratic Party, said it supports Buhari’s commitment to fight corruption but that due process must follow.
“The PDP supports the decision of the federal government to fight corruption in our country. However, we make bold to state that it should not be disguised to victimize innocent citizens. Democracy has come to stay in Nigeria and no citizen, irrespective of political, religious or ethnic affiliation should be denied access to due process and the rule of law in the process,” PDP spokesman Olisa Metuh said in a statement on Tuesday. “Furthermore, we make bold to state that he who comes to equity must come with clean hands.”
Good Morning from THE SLICK-HUCKSTER STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA!
Hi there! I live in the DIRT-BAG STATE! Where slick White Politicians and their Slave-Supporters, quietly steal away shit in the dead of the night. But call Blacks fighting back against THEIR BULLSHIT, thugs.
^_^!
So I did some more digging and I found out that the Cash Assistance Program of Pennsylvania was killed August 1st 2012 and much of the general populace KNEW NOTHING ABOUT IT. Again?
White & White-Jewish Media-Mediums?
They wanna push AN AGENDA!?
Can't shut them the FUCK UP!
They don't want you to know shit?
They won't even whisper A WORD ABOUT IT.
NOW!? What is INTERESTING IS THIS!? The MONEY for this PROGRAM!? DOES OR DID, EXIST! But Tom Corbett, decided HE WANTED THAT MONEY FOR WHATEVER. Because so far the trail is COLD IN REGARDS TO WHERE THE MONEY HAS GONE! And I am SPECIFICALLY TYPING THIS SO THAT MY OWN PEOPLE WILL SEE!
You gotta be FUCKIN KIDDING ME WITH THAT INTEGRATION BULLSHIT! Who THE FUCK!? Said we needed to INTEGRATE! With Whites. When they will do THIS KIND OF SHIT! STEAL MONEY FROM PEOPLE WHO NEED IT! OR FOR POTENTIAL EMERGENCIES FOR PEOPLE WHO COULD NEED IT! THEN COVER THEIR TRACKS SO THAT THE FUNDS CAN'T BE EASILY TRACKED DOWN REGARDING WHAT THAT DIVERTED MONEY IS NOW BEING USED FOR!
I have to say too? Me having a GODDAMN RELATIONSHIP AND HAVING WASTED ALL THAT TIME AND MONEY, DUMB! THAT WAS DUMB! FUCK WHETHER OR NOT SHIT WENT RIGHT IN THE RELATIONSHIP, FUCK THAT! I AM KICKIN MYSELF NOW CUZ I SHOULD HAVE PUT THAT MONEY TOWARDS MY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT LIKE I HAVE DONE NOW AND I'D HAVE BEEN WAY AHEAD OF THE GAME!
Live an Learn.
LIVE AND FUCKIN LEARN.
However!?
I'm not stupid.
I'm TOO OLD to be learning THIS KIND OF LESSON NOW.
Yes, I know that AT LEAST I'VE LEARNED FROM MY MISTAKE, BUT STILL!?
I should have known better.
I knew this kind of SHIT! Was going on around me, but I'm fuckin around and trying to have a relationship, where resources are being WASTED ON EMOTIONAL INVESTMENTS INSTEAD OF CONCRETE BUSINESS ENDS WHICH COULD HAVE PRODUCED INCOME AND REVENUES FOR ME TO HAVE AT THIS IMMEDIATE POINT AND TIME. Lemme go on ahead and do a journal entry to My Son and let him know RIGHT NOW! So HE UNDERSTANDS. Get YOUR FINANCES IN ORDER FIRST! WORRY ABOUT WOMEN LATER! GET YOUR FINANCES IN ORDER FIRST AS A BLACKMAN! WORRY ABOUT GETTING WITH YOUR BLACKWOMAN LATER!
When your finances are in order, then YOU CAN NOT ONLY BE IN A RELATIONSHIP?
BUT YOU CAN ENJOY IT!
When finances ARE FUCKED!?
As a Blackman!?
THEN SO ARE YOU!
And I am HAVING TO DUCK AND DODGE USING SOME OLE NANTO-SUI-CHOKEN, SHIT! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAH!
Here is the article;
State Cash Assistance Ends
POSTED 6:13 PM, AUGUST 1, 2012, BY SOFIA OJEDA, UPDATED AT 06:32PM, AUGUST 1, 2012
Thousands of people across the state may be facing some hard times ahead because Pennsylvania is doing away with the general cash assistance program.
The program, which provides money and other services for eligible individuals, ended on Wednesday.
The general assistance program helped about 70,000 people across the state, and more than 1,000 in Luzerne County.
People said it will devastate those who need it most, and put more demand on other assistance programs.
It’s a move by the governor of Pennsylvania people are calling devastating.
Pennsylvania’s general cash assistance program was left out of Governor Tom Corbett’s budget, a budget approved by state lawmakers back in June.
The loss of the program leaves thousands of poor Pennsylvanians without money they need. Some said it’s just wrong.
“For some people, it’s their livelihood, they depend on that, and for them to cut them off like that, it’s not right,” said Angela Stokes of Mountain Top.
Many the people who received assistance are recovering addicts or people who lack basic skills.
Every week, the St. Vincent de Paul Kitchen in Wilkes-Barre provides free meals to hundreds of people. Organizers said lots of people who received cash assistance weren’t even aware the program was ending.
“No one here has talked about it because they didn’t know it was going to happen. They were not informed ahead of time so they don’t understand when they go to use their card, it’s not going to be able to be used,” said Anne Marie McCawley of the soup kitchen.
The people that run St. Vincent de Paul Kitchen said it will not only hurt the people who need it the most, but it will also over run the programs that help them.
“It will affect us tremendously. I anticipate a lot more people coming especially in our food pantry,” said McCawley.
A spokesperson for the Department of Public Welfare in Harrisburg said people who were on the general cash assistance program will still get their federal assistance aid.
For those who were on the program and need help, they should contact their county assistance office to find out about other programs they may be eligible for.
I got a call this morning and spoke someone who told me up front that the cash assistance program in Pennsylvania is no longer in effect. But when I asked when did this happen they pointed out that the program had gotten gutted a few years back and I found THIS ARTICLE. What I LOVE is HOW QUIETLY THIS WAS DONE, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! And I laugh because Nazi-America ENCOURAGES CORRUPTION AND EVIL BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS.
But then TALKS SHIT WHEN THE MASSES ENGAGE IN THE SAME WHITE COLLAR CRIMES OF CORRUPTION AS THE WHITE FOOLS CLAIMING TO BE LAWMAKERS AND "BUSINESS PEOPLE", RAPE, PILLAGE AND PLUNDER WITH NO CONCERN THAT THEY'LL EVER SEE THE INSIDE OF A CELL OR THE BARREL OF A GUN WHEN THEIR TIME COMES.
Not even gonna lie, when I was talking with this man JUST NOW I was like "Thank God I didn't marry Stacey, because she honestly thinks shit is SWEET here. Shhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit. You lose your job RIGHT NOW!? Yo? You're fuckin dead." seriously. You will be ON THE STREET before you know what hit you. What is even more interesting is the fact that in the article to follow it pretty much tells you that Pennsylvania Lawmakers transferred the funds TO THEMSELVES and set things up to SUPPOSEDLY give tax-cuts to small businesses. I'd need to do more digging to find out how much truth there is to that, but? Here is the article;
Originally Published: 6/25/2012
Pa. to end cash assistance program
Money will shift toward tax cuts and credits for businesses
HARRISBURG — Jake Fleming had nothing: He would wash up in the bathroom of a fast-food joint and, as he tells it, didn't have 99 cents to buy a hamburger.
Determined to leave behind 30 years of alcohol and drug addiction, he entered detox for eight days in February 2008 and then lived in a recovery house while he sought daily addiction treatment for nine months.
Pennsylvania's Depression-era cash assistance program that he credits with paying his way back into the land of the living is now on Gov. Tom Corbett's chopping block, while Republican-controlled Harrisburg is poised to shift the cash instead toward tax cuts for businesses and a business tax credit that helps subsidize private school scholarships.
"That saved my life," Fleming said. "I wouldn't be talking to you today if it wasn't for General Assistance. That's how a lot of alcohol and drug addicts are. They have nowhere else to turn."
Fleming, of Philadelphia, is now a peer specialist and case manager at Northeast Treatment Centers, the place where he recovered. He's caring for his 14-year-old daughter and, he said, has repaid tenfold the meager $200-a-month General Assistance checks by paying taxes.
Fleming's story is the kind that advocates for this program are trying to impress upon lawmakers and the governor.
In May, a coalition of more than 100 groups — including the AARP, United Way, Pennsylvania Prison Society, Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence and a spectrum of advocates for organized religions — asked Corbett and lawmakers to reconsider.
They've refused.
General Assistance is the "last gasp" for nearly 70,000 of Pennsylvania's least fortunate residents and is the last link in the state's safety net, said Stephen Drachler, executive director of United Methodist Advocacy in Pennsylvania.
"Every decision that our leaders are making in this process is a moral choice," Drachler said. "I do think it's a sad state of affairs when government abdicates a moral responsibility to help those who are the most in need."
In February, when the state's fiscal outlook was more challenging, Corbett proposed eliminating the $150 million General Assistance program, which ends up costing more like $126 million a year after the federal government reimburses Pennsylvania for recipients who eventually qualify for Social Security disability benefits.
Administration officials reasoned that programs for the poor were rising in cost faster than the state could afford, and it was easy to cut General Assistance because it isn't mandated by the federal government and most other states don't provide it.
However, tax collections have since improved. As a result, state lawmakers proposed fattening 2012-13 fiscal year spending by more than a half-billion dollars to undo cuts in subsidies that Corbett had proposed, including for universities, public schools, county-run social services, the racehorse industry, medical research, retailers that collect sales taxes and hospitals and nursing homes that care for the poor.
They even erased a $12 million cut for the Legislature that Corbett proposed, even though the Legislature nurses a cash reserve well in excess of $100 million.
The nearly $27.7 billion budget plan that Corbett and leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature shook hands on last week would increase overall spending in 2012-13 by about 1.5 percent. That is below the average increase of 2.2 percent for states projected by the National Governors Association and the National Association of State Budget Officers.
The spending plan also would cut $275 million in taxes for businesses and would double to $150 million a tax-credit program that rewards businesses for contributing to nonprofit groups that offer scholarships to students who transfer to private schools or to public schools outside their home district.
Meanwhile, the plan would leave almost $400 million in reserve when the next fiscal year ends on June 30, 2013.
The package of budget bills looks like it will pass right before Sunday, when the 2012-13 fiscal year begins, meaning that many recipients are likely to receive no official notice before they miss a check. Department of Public Welfare spokeswoman Carey Miller said that if the benefit is eliminated, the agency will send letters to recipients.
One of those recipients is Brenda Freeman of Philadelphia.
At 38, she has been on General Assistance since November and is hoping to secure Social Security disability status because of peripheral edema — a painful condition that involves swelling tissue in her legs and arm. She last worked as a security guard in 2009, when she was laid off, she said, and losing General Assistance will mean being unable to supplement the means provided by food stamps for her and her husband, who is also on Social Security disability.
"I guess I'll have to go to food pantries," Freeman said, "and there's hardly any of those left anymore."
For addicts, Fleming said ending General Assistance will effectively flush them into shelters, jails and hospitals if they no other way to afford treatment.
"The impact is going to be enormous," Fleming said.
